Tag Archives: Shirley

Link

2014-02-11 046

Hello all! Sorry I haven’t blogged in awhile. I’ve been so busy trying to complete the maps for this year by the June 30th deadline.  But, I am proud to announce that the Geologic Maps for Shirley and Fairfield Bay are now published and available on our website!  Click below to view and download the maps.

http://www.geology.ar.gov/maps_pdf/geologic/24k_maps/Shirley.pdf http://www.geology.ar.gov/maps_pdf/geologic/24k_maps/Fairfield%20Bay.pdf

The process to create these maps takes an entire year. I kept you updated each field week from July to April last year, so I thought you might be interested to know how we take the raw data we collected in the field and use it to make a map. First of all, it’s a collaborative effort.  It takes a lot of people who specialize in various disciplines working together to make this product.  Basically, drawing the map starts with the notes we took in the field.  At each point, we tried to identify the rock formation exposed there.  Sometimes this was difficult, especially in the southern portion of the Boston Mountains Plateau where we worked this year. These rocks are all so similar–mostly sandstone and shale.  Nevertheless, if you cover as much ground as we did, you begin to discern similarities in the rock types and bedding structures, and can make formation calls based on those similarities.  Many of the points are taken on what we considered to be contacts between different formations.  These points are used to hand draw contact lines on a blank topographic base map. 2014-07-11 0032014-07-11 007 These lines are continued into areas where the contacts may not be exposed, because we assume lateral continuity of these units.  Many times there are topographic breaks along these contacts which can help us draw the lines in areas of poor exposure or in areas we just didn’t get to.  Structural lines are drawn along the trace of faults or other structures at the surface in areas where we saw the hallmarks of faulting such as deformation bands and non-vertical joints.  Also, the many strike and dip measurements we took were plotted on the map and helped determine orientation of faults and other structures, such as the axis of a monocline.  Once all the lines were neatly drawn on the topo, it was scanned into the computer and georeferenced to the grid of all quads in the state.  Next, each line was painstakingly digitized in ArcView by one of our cartographers, in this case Brian Kehner.  The digitized map was then added to a layout that Danny created in Adobe Illustrator. 2014-07-11 008

The layout includes descriptions of each formation developed from our field notes and are specific to each quad.  A correlation of map units, a generalized stratigraphic column, an inset map of the locations of the field points, a symbol chart, and a rose diagram of the frequency of each joint direction are also added to the layout.  A cross-section based on formation thickness is hand drawn, digitized, and placed along the bottom of the layout. Formations are symbolized by color and an abbreviation.  Sometimes photos are added to balance the layout.  Also plotted are any quarries or pits we found or were in the economic commodities database we keep at the Survey.

2014-07-11 012 After we have a reasonably good map, it’s printed and set out for staff review.  They really let us have it, but this editing process always greatly improves the maps.  After two or three revisions, we finalize it and send it to the USGS by June 30 to fulfill the requirements of the STATEMAP grant.  Whew!  What a relief!Geologic Map of Shirley red1 Geologic Map of Fairfield Bay red This year, as in years past, I have designed a commemorative STATEMAP t-shirt.  I’m taking orders until July 25th if anyone is interested.  They are available for the cost of the shirt you choose plus the printing.  Please email me at richard.hutto@arkansas.gov for details. AGS14_shirt_front (1)AGS14_shirt_back (1) Now we get ready to head back out again to our new field area.  This year we’ll be mapping the Parma, Prim, and Greers Ferry quads.  I’m breaking in a new field partner this time out.  Andrew Haner says he’s looking forward to seeing some of the Arkansas wilderness.   I just hope the snake count is low this year.  From what I’ve see so far, the ticks seem to be at an all time high.  I’ll try to keep you posted, but will be out of the office four days a week this year.  That will leave little time for blogging.  So until my next post, I’ll see you on the outcrop! Richard Hutto

Advertisements

Statemap Field Blog, April 7-9, 2014

2014-04-07 006

Hello all,

Well, this is the last week of field work for the 2013-14 season.  Of course, there’s always more one would like to have a look at, but we have to stop sometime.  On Monday, we started down by the M&NA railroad bridge at Shirley.  The big fault that makes the SW/NE lineation goes through here somewhere, but it’s difficult to say where exactly.  There are lots of non-vertical joints and deformation bands in the area, which are all good fault signs, but nothing very definitive.  The area north of the bridge is about as thick as it could possibly be with greenbriers –only passable with much effort and many scratches.  We saw very thick-bedded sandstone there which we took for Witts Springs that day, but when we came back on Wednesday, we decided it may be north of the fault, and therefore would be Imo.  We have Imo across the valley, so it’s not out of the question to have it here, but it may be just a relatively thin slice.  There are many cut and fill channel beds there, some of them with very nice soft-sediment deformation at the margins.

On Tuesday we finished up some loose ends in the northwest corner of the Shirley quad.  After we climbed way down in a hollow that had an old tornado track going through it, Danny realized he had lost his camera somewhere.  We hiked back up to the Jeep to see if it was there (it wasn’t), then retraced our steps from earlier that morning.  Still nothing.  He remembered the last time he had used it was in that horrible briar patch the day before, so after we climbed out again, we headed back there.  Sure enough, in the thickest part of the patch, where he had been practically crawling to get through, a briar had reached in his carrying case and pulled it out.  It was still dangling there about a foot off the ground right on the river bank.  At least we got it back!

Deformation bands in massive sandstone near Middle Fork north of Shirley2014-04-07 017

2014-04-09 026 2014-04-09 011On Tuesday afternoon, we went down a drainage on the west side of Middle Fork looking for more signs of a fault we have traced from the Old Lexington quad.  We definitely found a lot of deformation bands in the Witts Springs massives down there and figure there might be as much as 80 feet of throw on the fault.

2014-04-08 0192014-04-08 027Wednesday was our last day in the field this year, and we spent most of our time on the Middle Fork just north of Shirley where we had left off on Monday.  Did look like the fault goes through there because we found very-thick bedded massives on the north side (Imo) and shale interbedded with very thin-bedded sandstone on the south side (Cane Hill).  Our last couple of hours we spent getting points in several road cuts in and around Shirley.  We took a final photo in front of the town sign.

2014-04-08 048 (2)2014-04-09 047This will be Danny’s last year out in the field with me, so I’d like to take this opportunity to thank him for putting up with me and the sometimes horrendous field conditions we’ve faced together the last five years.   Looks like I’ll have to break in a new field partner next year, so should be interesting.  Now comes the time of year when we have to sit in the office and draw the maps, create the layouts, and finish the database, all to be turned in to the USGS by June 30.  It seems like a long time, but we’re always editing down to the last minute.  By the time we make it back out in the field, it will be mid-July, so the ticks and snakes will be out in full force, it will be nice and hot, and all the vegetation will be full grown.  At least that gives us something to look forward to.  Until then, I’ll see you in the office.  After that, I’ll see you on the outcrop!

 

 

 

Statemap Field Blog, Dec 10-12, 2013

2013-12-10 021

Hello all!

Well, we did have a winter weather event last Friday that was still on the ground in the field area the following Tuesday.  Roads were fairly clear to Clinton, but between Clinton and Shirley it was still mostly patches of snow and ice.  North of Shirley, the roads were pretty much all covered with snow and ice.  Even “Goldy” (our Jeep) got stuck briefly when Danny decided to stop and check his map almost at the top of a hill.

Tuesday we managed to get to a drainage south of the Middle Fork that had fairly low relief, so were able to climb down the side and follow it on down.  There were some very large footprints in the snow along the valley floor that may have been a feral pig, but don’t know for sure.  It’s amazing how the critters always choose the easiest route.  Their trails are usually pretty good for people too, though they don’t often care about avoiding briar patches.  The snow was pretty crunchy, so fairly good traction.  Having snow on the ground rather evens out the terrain in an odd way, though you have to be poised to catch yourself with every step.  Had some massive sandstone units, but they were blocky and non-calcareous, so we’re in something different than on the north side of the river.

2013-12-10 0432013-12-10 045

The next day we managed to make our way north of Shirley to a couple drainages at the head of Indian Creek that we had skipped when we did the lower end.  As it happened it was a pretty good choice because the relief was rather low and the bottom was fairly wide.  Also, it was south-facing which helped to melt the crusty snow and maybe keep us a little warmer.  We saw mostly massive calcareous sandstone units of the Witts Springs though may have gotten into the Bloyd in the higher elevations.  At the end of the day we entered an area that still showed signs of damage from the Jan. 2009 ice storm that coated most of northwest Arkansas with a thick layer of ice and downed many trees–many by the roots.  Witnessed a beautiful sunset on the way out though.  We were near 1400 feet which is about the highest elevation on the quad.  The trees there were still coated in ice from last Friday’s storm.

2013-12-11 0312013-12-11 0152013-12-11 0122013-12-11 004

Thursday we tried another drainage near the one we hiked on Tuesday.  This one was north-facing and proved to be too steep and narrow a descent to do with so much snow on the ground.  The snow had developed a thick icy crust from thawing and refreezing, and we had to break through it to get traction.  I managed to get up and around on the side of a particularly narrow spot in the creek bed, and was waiting for Danny to follow when I saw him retreating back upstream.  I later found out that he couldn’t find purchase on the icy banks, so decided to return the way we had come.  Since I had gotten farther downstream by breaking through the crusty snow and climbing down the steep side, I had no choice but to climb back up that way.  I found that going on up was less hazardous than going back down toward the creek, so I continued to climb up the side and by the time I drew even with Danny was probably 100 feet higher.  I could barely see him down there, but managed to get a photo of him climbing up the drainage.  We’ll have to try that one again when the snow is gone!

2013-12-12 0042013-12-12 0222013-12-12 022 (2)

After that, we got a few points on Weaver Creek were it leaves the western edge of the map, and headed back to Little Rock.  Hope this clears up by next week!  Until then, see you on the ice-covered outcrop!

2013-12-11 064

 

 

Statemap Field Blog—Dec. 2-4, 2013

2013-12-02 031

Hello all!

This week we finished up a few odds and ends on the Shirley quad.  We needed to get to a few suspected outcrops along the north side of the Middle Fork just east of Shirley.  As we were looking for a way to access them, we stumbled upon the Sid Burgess Historic M&NA Trail which starts in downtown Shirley and ends up about a mile distant at the historic Cottrell-Wilson Cemetery.  As luck would have it, this trail happened to access the very areas we needed to see.  If you’re ever in Shirley, it’s definitely worth checking out!

2013-12-02 0112013-12-02 0152013-12-02 018

We saw mostly thin-bedded sandstone and shale units of the same variety as on the south side of the Middle Fork and Weaver Creek upstream.  There are a few low dips toward the lineation, but nothing indicating a major structure.  I’m thinking this may all be the unit above the Witts Springs (Bloyd Formation) brought down to the southeast by a monocline.  The trouble is, we don’t really know what the Bloyd/Witts Springs contact looks like in this area yet.  That’s something we still need to work out.

Tuesday was wet again, but we set out to finish up the southernmost branch of Lost Creek anyway.  Seems to be mostly Witts Springs in there with some Cane Hill at the bottom of the valley.  We saw some great examples of soft-sediment deformation in some of the silty units on the way down.  Soft sediment deformation occurs during sedimentation when the rapid loading of usually more dense, overlying sediments causes the less dense, buried deposits beneath them to become partially liquefied, which forms various types of disruptions in the original bedding.  This can take the form of simple reorientation of the bedding as we have here, to more complex convolute bedding and flame structures.  I took a photo later in the week of a good flame structure in the Bloyd Formation.  Notice where the shale has been squeezed up between the thick, contorted beds of sandstone.

2013-12-03 0072013-12-04 019

Several massive calcareous sandstone units in the Witts Springs again illustrated the dramatic difference between outcrops weathered with and without the influence of groundwater.  Notice how rotten the outcrop of massive sandstone in the photo below left appears.  Also note the green color.  There is a layer of moss and lichen growing over almost the entire rock surface, made possible by its relative saturation by groundwater.  These organisms help accelerate the weathering of the rock, and there are places where you can actually see clumps of moss peeling off the surface along with a layer of sand.  This type of chemical weathering is known as chelation and results in the effective removal of the residual iron cement still holding the rock together after the calcite cement has been dissolved by groundwater.  The photo below right shows how “dry weathering” of a boulder of the same material can result in well-defined liesegang bands.  Highly concentrated iron has cemented these bands within the massive sandstone, and without the influence of groundwater, they are preferentially resistant to weathering, leaving them in bold relief.

2013-12-03 015

2013-12-03 034

On Friday, we looked at some of the last steep areas we haven’t vistited north of the Middle Fork east of Shirley.  Definitely still have Witts Springs right down to the river there, but there is also a thin- to very thick-bedded unit above it that is probably in the Bloyd.  We saw a fairly recent landslide above the river composed of material from that upper unit.  There was also a good cut and fill channel bed exposed in that unit as well.

2013-12-04 0052013-12-04 0142013-12-04 0152013-12-04 020

It was warm enough for the critters to be out again this week.  Just when I thought it was safe to put my foot down anywhere I pleased, I nearly stepped on a moccasin.  That’s him slinking back in his hole.  We also saw a western slimy salamander (plethodon albagula?) under some storm debris, which was subsequently replaced.

2013-12-04 0032013-12-03 046

Hopefully the warm weather holds out, but the forecast says the bottom may drop out on Friday.  We’ll see!

Until next week, see you on the outcrop!

 

STATEMAP Field Blog, Nov. 18-20, 2013

2013-11-19 062

Hello all!

Well, another great week to look at rocks!  We explored about a five mile stretch of Big Branch, definitely the biggest drainage left unexplored on the Shirley quad at this point.  Quite a bit of Cane Hill in the bottom, then several hundred feet of Witts Springs above.  The rocks near its confluence with Weaver Creek are dipping strongly southeast, and the Cane Hill actually dives into the subsurface there.

2013-11-19 0192013-11-18 0052013-11-19 029

Still haven’t decided if the big structure in Weaver Creek valley is a fault or just a really big monocline, but we’re leaning toward monocline right now because we still haven’t seen a real break in the rocks.  Of course, faults typically become covered because the fractured rock is preferentially eroded.  It just seems less and less likely that there is a fault there with each drainage we do that should cut across it.

Monday we walked in the lower end and got several strong SE dips in the Cane Hill.  Then we discovered an outstanding outcrop of basal Witts Springs sandstone, that we thought was a very large boulder at first because of the advanced state of the sort of “dry weathering” that usually affects the massive Witts Springs boulders after they become separated from groundwater, usually along joints, as they slide downslope.  This includes well-developed honeycomb taphoni, well-defined liesegang banding, and case-hardening of the surface.  In the bluff face, solutionally-enlarged joints can form fracture caverns, and spalling near the base can form bluff shelters.  All of this can happen under the influence of groundwater of course, but that kind of saturation usually leads to a punky or rotten texture in the rock, and forms very steep, covered topography.  The really spectacular outcrops occur when lack of groundwater slows down the weathering to a grain-by-grain process.  This is what I call “dry weathering”.  After walking up both sides and along the top, we concluded that it was indeed part of a continuous outcrop that was probably protected from groundwater penetration by its joint system.  I dubbed it “Castle Rock” because of its many turrets and towers.

2013-11-19 045

2013-11-18 0262013-11-18 036

2013-11-18 039

2013-11-19 033

Speaking of weathering, on Tuesday we saw a classic example of preferential weathering along beds of sandy limestone interbedded with limey sandstone.  When these beds are freshly exposed, they form light and dark bands within a smooth face of massive sandstone.  We refer to this informally as “zebra rock”.  The light bands are more limey, the dark bands less.  As weathering progresses, chemical weathering breaks down the more limey areas at an accelerated rate simply because there is more reactive material in that rock than in the sandier beds around it.  When weathered, these areas form long horizontal hollows or pits in the massive sandstone.

2013-11-20 0092013-11-20 008

We informally refer to this weathering pattern as “Prairie Grove weathering” after a Member of the Hale Formation in northwest Arkansas that most typically exemplifies this trait.  The base of the Witts Springs Formation is an equivalent unit to the Prairie Grove Member, and often massive sandstones within the Witts Springs will display this type of weathering as well.  Though not definitive, this characteristic can be used to help us determine if a given outcrop is within the Witts Springs.

2013-11-19 0502013-11-19 080

As we made are way up the Big Branch, we ran into our old nemesis: the February 5, 2008 tornado track.  This is the one that was on the ground for 122 miles in Arkansas and killed 14 people.  We’ve crossed it’s track on several maps, and it never ceases to amaze how destructive it was.

2013-11-19 077

I’ll be back next week.  Until then, see you on the outcrop!

 

 

 

 

STATEMAP Field Blog Oct. 14 – 16, 2013

Hello all!

It was a rather wet week in the field this week.  Starting to see a little fall color as well, but still mostly green.  We worked in Weaver Creek which runs along that southwest/northeast lineation on the southern part of the Shirley quad.  It appears that the wide valley there and in the Middle Fork to the northeast is developed in a very thick shale sequence that is all dipping southeast, probably southeast of the major fault causing the lineation.  The valley can widen significantly in the shale, but once it reaches the 200+ feet thick, thin- to massive-bedded sandstone unit on the southeast side of the valley, it can’t go much farther.  Essentially the lineation is caused by the stream eroding upsection across the valley through the shale unit, until it reaches the contact with the thick sandstone unit above.  The lineation is therefore along the strike of (perpendicular to) the southeast dipping rock in this area.  One big question is what happens to the fault on the east side of the map where the lineation stops.  May have to wait to find out next year when we map the Parma quad.

Started out on Buffalo Hump, which I think may be a reference to a series of rounded “humps” along the end of Weaver Creek where the sandstone bluff is deeply incised by four drainages.   

2013-10-14 0152013-10-14 019

2013-10-14 002

Saw several sets of non-vertical joints crossing each other in one of those drainages.  This usually indicates that there is a structure close-by, but we didn’t see anything unusual.

The next two days were rainy, so we stayed close to the highway so we could bale out in the event of a deluge.  The shaly unit was well exposed in the valley and displayed abundant soft-sediment deformation and load casts.

2013-10-15 003

2013-10-16 006

It was difficult to ascertain the true dip of the rocks because this unit is a stack of very broad channels, so the beds dip consistently for a long way, then abruptly turn about 90 degrees and continue on like that for a ways, then switch back. The exposed edges of these channels typically dip sharply and are sandier.    Wish we had more time to study this unit to determine paleocurrent direction, facies, and depositional environment, but as usual, we’re just passing through.

2013-10-16 011

2013-10-16 0142013-10-16 018

2013-10-16 025

The channel-bedding continues into the sandy unit above as well.  The big question is what formation these units are in.  Now that we’ve worked our way south of the fault, we’re in a totally different section than we were in north of it.  Still haven’t seen anything that looks too familiar.  May have to pull well logs and work our way up from the subsurface to get started.

2013-10-16 0602013-10-16 062

Well, looks like better weather next week!  See you on the outcrop!

Tick attacks: 1

Statemap Field Blog–Oct 7-9, 2013

2013-10-07 005

Hello all!

Well, it was good to be back in the field again after a week of “vacation” (painting my daughter’s bedroom).  The weather is really getting a lot nicer now, and the ticks have almost given up.  We’re still working on the larger tributaries to the Middle Fork, so that they will be done by the time the dry season ends.  The Middle Fork is still low enough for us to cross it easily which is good because road access on the north side of the river turned out to be very limited.

2013-10-08 033

2013-10-08 032

We finished up the last two big drainages that flow south into the Middle Fork east of Shirley.  Mostly a big stack of massive-bedded, calcareous sandstone, but little sign of the shalier Cane Hill which is still prominent along the river to the west.  This might suggest that the Cane Hill is either faulted out or that the tilt of the rocks to the southeast brings the Witts Springs to a lower elevation near the large southwest-northeast trending fault just to the south along the river.  Whichever it is, we’ll need more data to determine.  We did see a good example of travertine precipitating on some of the thin-bedded calcareous sandstone.  Slightly acidic groundwater is solutioning the calcium carbonate (calcite) with which this particular sandstone is cemented.  It is then precipitated where the water seeps out of the rock, in this case along a joint.  This lets us know that the adjacent rocks are calcareous, which in turn may help us determine what formation it’s in.2013-10-08 009 

We also saw some good deformation bands, which as I’ve said in a previous post is one of the signs that a fault is nearby.  These were in float, and though I looked high and low, I couldn’t find the source.  Certainly evidence of a lot of stress in these rocks!

2013-10-08 0212013-10-08 016

2013-10-09 004The other drainage we looked at is north of Shirley and is extremely steep and badly overgrown.  The sides were so boxed in we couldn’t come down the main channel, and had to try a side branch.  We did make it down that way, but with great difficulty.  Once we got to the bottom, we could only get within about 40 feet of the Witts Springs/Cane Hill contact in the main channel, because the lower end was boxed in as well.  We usually don’t give up until we get our point, but this one was deemed impenetrable.  The break is visible in the contours, so shouldn’t be too difficult to draw in anyway.  On the way down the side branch, I spied a round rock or “Prim boulder”.  These are definitely coming out of the Witts Springs.

2013-10-09 009Also saw more deformation bands, this time way up at the top of a 40 foot massive of basal Witts Springs sandstone.  That band you see in the close-up is about 6 inches wide!  The last photo is the Cane Hill in the box canyon below the contact.  The sheer bluff of massive Witts Springs sandstone was visible on both sides above.  I was rewarded by finding a large patch of muscadines on the way out.  They continue to get sweeter each week!  Wish I could have stayed to fill a bucket, but had to make do with a pocketful.  Made a nice snack during the hike back to the Jeep.  This is definitely a banner year for the muscadine crop!

2013-10-09-010.jpg

2013-10-09 011

Hope y’all have a good week, and see you on the outcrop!

Tick attacks: mild